Cave Art in WWII

The Phoney War was an eight-month period at the start of World War II in 1939 during which there was only one limited military land operation on the Western Front, when French troops invaded Germany’s Saar district. During this time the Nazi’s had invaded Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. On 10 May 1940, eight months after Britain and France had declared war on Germany, Nazi troops marched into Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg, marking the end of the Phoney War and the start of Germany being an advancing danger to the British. Some months later the Germans took control of Guernsey and Jersey. The British activities in the war were mostly at sea with the Navy disabling German shipping in an economic blockade and the troops on the mainland of Europe were drawn back to the retreat in Dunkirk.

image

 Trafalgar Square, October 1941

It was around this time that the National Gallery collection of paintings was to be evacuated out of London as from September 1940 to May 1941 the Blitz happened, by mistake.

The first German attack on London actually occurred by accident. On the night of August 24, 1940, Luftwaffe bombers aiming for military targets on the outskirts of London drifted off course and instead dropped their bombs on the centre of London destroying several homes and killing civilians. Amid the public outrage that followed, Prime Minister Winston Churchill, believing it was a deliberate attack, ordered Berlin to be bombed the next evening.

About 40 British bombers managed to reach Berlin and inflicted minimal property damage. However, the Germans were utterly stunned by the British air-attack on Hitler’s capital. It was the first time bombs had ever fallen on Berlin. Making matters worse, they had been repeatedly assured by Luftwaffe Chief, Hermann Göring, that it could never happen. A second British bombing raid on the night of August 28/29 resulted in Germans killed on the ground. Two nights later, a third attack occurred. German nerves were frayed. The Nazis were outraged. In a speech delivered on September 4, Hitler threatened, “When the British Air Force drops two or three or four thousand kilograms of bombs, then we will in one night drop 150-, 230-, 300- or 400,000 kilograms. When they declare that they will increase their attacks on our cities, then we will raze their cities to the ground. We will stop the handiwork of those night air pirates, so help us God!”

Beginning on September 7, 1940, and for a total of 57 consecutive nights, London was bombed. The decision to wage a massive bombing campaign against London and other English cities would prove to be one of the most fateful of the war. Up to that point, the Luftwaffe had targeted Royal Air Force airfields and support installations and had nearly destroyed the entire British air defence system. Switching to an all-out attack on British cities gave RAF Fighter Command a desperately needed break and the opportunity to rebuild damaged airfields, train new pilots and repair aircraft. “It was,” Churchill later wrote, “therefore with a sense of relief that Fighter Command felt the German attack turn on to London”.

The feeling was it was unwise to have the National Galleries collection separate in locations as one location would save on guarding the works and help keep the location more secret and avoid any potential losses of work in transportation or admin. The curators could also monitor the condition of the paintings too.

One serious proposal was for the paintings to be evacuated by ship to Canada. But the vulnerability of the ships to U-boat attack worried the Gallery’s director, Kenneth Clark. He went to see Winston Churchill who immediately vetoed the idea: ‘Hide them in caves and cellars, but not one picture shall leave this island’.

The danger of shipping was just as worrying as the dangers on the  dockland. One chance bomb could wipe out the whole collection in a dockland warehouse while waiting to be loaded.

image

 Martin Pritchard – Manod Quarry, 2008

image

 Manod Quarry, 1940s

The Welsh quarry of Manod was chosen as the best location. After the quarries entrance was widened with explosive blasts so that trucks could drive inside, the next task was to build man structure inside to house the collection.

image

 Lee McGrath – Inside Manod Quarry, 2018

These brick buildings (like bungalows) were built inside the cave quarry with roofs and picture racks. There were thermostat and humidity controllers to stop the paintings becoming damp or suffering changes in temperature. By the end of the Blitz the whole collection was now housed in the cave.

image

 Manod Quarry – Inside the Art Bungalows housing the National Collection.

It had long been known that paintings were happiest in conditions of stable humidity and temperature. But it had never been possible to monitor a whole collection in such controlled circumstances before. Valuable discoveries were made during this time which were to influence the way the collection was displayed and cared for once back in London after the war.

It was also an opportunity for Martin Davies, the Assistant Keeper in charge of the paintings in Wales, to complete his research for new editions of the National Gallery’s permanent collection catalogues. ‡

image

 Manod Quarry – Inside the Art Bungalows housing the National Collection.

The precautions were wise as the National Gallery was hit by nine bombs between October 1940 and April 1941.

The collection returned to London by the end of 1945 but the caves were held as government property in case they were needed during the Cold War.


The curious thing about the nations art during wartime was it didn’t all get put together. The National Gallery had the quarry in Manod but the National Portrait Gallery moved their collection to Mentmore House, in Buckinghamshire. The Gallery evacuated its portraits to Mentmore’s outbuildings.

The Tate Gallery had moved their works, to a disused stations on the Piccadilly London Underground network.

image

 Photograph of a letter to Robin Ironside with the key to the Piccadilly Underground storeroom from Neil MacLaren.

The History Place – The Blitz 
The Gallery in Wartime

All Saints and Saint Andrew, Kingston.

Here is a brief bit of information and some photographs from the church in Kingston, Cambridgeshire. It’s within cycling distance from my home so I went and took some photos of the church and surroundings.

image
image

The most interesting features of Kingston Church is the wall paintings with-in. Many didn’t survive the reformation and ‘whitewashing’ of churches and fewer still the later Victorian fashion of stripping plaster from walls in favour of stonework and totally refitting the woodwork.

image

Above is a wall painting of the Crucifixion, with unusual iconography. On a red ochre ground decorated with a brocade pattern there are three silhouettes, of a crucifix and two figures. On either side of the crucifix is a kneeling angel holding a cup which catches Christ’s blood; beyond these a pair of angels playing musical instruments and a pair censing. The censers, with their chains, were probably appliqué wood or metal. Above the rood are two faint circles, representing the sun, to the left, and the crescent moon, to the right, symbolising life and death.

image

One of the paintings on the walls is of the Devil standing on a tree. He has bat wings, a tale and horns. 

image

The Seven Acts of Mercy – Wheel of Mercy.

Six of the seven acts, intended to counter-balance the Seven Deadly Sins, were derived from the gospel of St Matthew, Chapter XXV:

  1. feeding the hungry;
  2. giving drink to the thirsty; 
  3. offering hospitality to the stranger; 
  4. clothing the naked; 
  5. visiting the sick; 
  6. visiting prisoners. 
  7. burying the dead – this one comes from the Book of Tobit, Chapter I. 

The wheel is turned by two angels with outstretched arms, one to the lower left, the other to the lower right.

image
image
image
image
image
image

First Prize at the Slade

The University College London and the Slade School of Fine Art are linked and in the UCL art archives are many painting from the Slade’s past. Many are nudes and it turns out, they are the winners of the Slade School of Art prize for Figure Painting. I have not included all the paintings – some are un-named and un-dated but must fit in the missing spaces. I have put them in order of date and many of the names listed are surprisingly famous.

Frederick Brown was appointed as Slade Professor in 1892 and introduced new prizes for the 1893-4 session. The prizes for life painting and drawing, anatomical drawing and new figure composition. The prizes were abandoned in 1965 and in 1966 students could choose what they presented. I don’t know what the prizes were for Figure Drawing but I do know Stanley Spencer won the Slade Summer Composition Prize in 1912 and it was £25, today with inflation that is £2,800. 

image

 Augustus Edwin John – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1898

image

 Evelyn Cheston – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1898

image

 William Orpen – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1899

image

 Albert Rutherston – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1901

image

 Elinor Proby Adams – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1906

image

 Maxwell Gordon Lightfoot – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1909

image

 Maxwell Gordon Lightfoot – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1909

image

 Elsie McNaught – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1910

image

 Edward Alexander Wadsworth – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1911

image

 Thomas Saunders Nash – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1912

image

 Dora Carrington – Figure Painting, Second Prize, 1912

image

 Eileen Lambton – Figure Painting, Third Prize, 1912

image

 Dora Carrington – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1913

image

 Thomas Tennant Baxter – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1914

image

 Thomas Tennant Baxter – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1914

image

 Arthur Outlaw – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1914

image

 Grace English – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1916

image

 Neville Lewis – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1916

image

 Helen G. Young – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1916

image

 Enid M. Fearnside – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1917

image

 Rita Nahabedian – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1917

image

 Henry Charles Bevan-Petman – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1917

image

 Alice Joyce-Smith – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1918

image

 Dorothy Josephine Coke – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1918

image

 L. A. (Ida) Knox – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1918

image

 Mabel Greenberg – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1919

image

 Ralph Nicholas Chubb – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1919

image

 Amy Nimr – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1919

image

 Robin Guthrie – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1920

image

 C. E. Roberts – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1920

image

 Rodney Joseph Burn – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1920

image

 Daphne Pollen – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1920

image

 Daphne Pollen – Figure Painting, Second Prize (Equal), 1920

image

 Rodney Joseph Burn – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1921

image

 Walter Thomas Monnington – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1921

image

 Muriel Holinger Hope – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1921

image

 Allan Gwynne-Jones – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1922

image

 Theodora Meares – Figure Painting, Second Prize, 1922

image

 Robert Boyd Morrison – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1923

image

 John Hookham – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1923

image

 William D. Dring – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1924

image

 Rex Whistler – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1924

image

 Robin Bartlett – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1925

image

 Leila Faithfull – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1925

image

 Jesse Dale Cast – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1925

image

 Alice van den Bergh – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1926

image

 Francis E. Hopkinson – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1926

image

Glynn O. Jones – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1926

image

 Kathleen Hartnell – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1926

image

 Ena Muriel Russell Higson – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1927

image

 Helen Lessore – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1927

image

 Joseph H. Rogozen – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1928

image

 Dorothy I. Reid – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1928

image

 Bryan William Bodington – Figure Painting, First Prize,
1930

image

 Olga Lehmann – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1931

image

 Elizabeth Brown – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1931

image

 Margaret A. Berry – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1932

image

 Thelma Carstensen – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1933

image

 Guy Anthony William Burn – Figure Painting, First Prize,
1937

image

 Mary Kent Harrison – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1938 

image

 Nora B. Braham – Figure Painting, First Prize, 1939

image

 William D. W. Paynter – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1940

image

 Jean Muriel Brett – Figure Painting, Second Prize, 1943

image

 Nancy Mellor – Figure Painting, First Prize (Equal), 1948

Better Known Podcast – Robjn Cantus

Better Known Podcast – Robjn Cantus

Discover Robert Henderson Blyth

There is always the thrill of what comes next in my hunt for things to buy and own. I found this artist’s work, printed in black and white in the studio magazine and knew I would love it. The magazine was from 1958 and I think the art that I have been able to find so far by Henderson Blyth makes him an unknown treasure, to me anyhow.

Among the younger established painters of the Contemporary Scottish School none has attained a more prominent place than Henderson Blyth.

Blyth is a true Scot. He has inherited the characteristic temperament of his people and his art is the embodiment of all that is nordic, elemental and discrete. In addition he has inherited the Scots intellectual curiosity and insatiable appetite for intimate knowledge of the phenomenal world. Together these ingredients account for the peculiarly personal and indigenous quality of his work.

Trained at Glasgow, he was early initiated into the poetry of tone and the ‘logic’ of form. A year’s study under the late James Cowie, R.S.A. at the country Art School at Hospitalfield enabled him to continue and develop his personal interests and leanings. Cowie was an impeccable draughtsman, a fastidious classicist and a man of profound artistic integrity. To a young romantic the environment at Hospitalfield could hardly have been better adapted to his intellectual and spiritual requirements. A prodigious worker. Blyth’s reputation rests primarily upon his landscapes which are burdened and sombre.

image

 Robert Henderson Blyth – Rain on the Hill

image

 Robert Henderson Blyth – Thunder Light, 1967 

image

 Robert Henderson Blyth – Self-portrait as soldier in trenches – Sub-titled ‘Existence Precarious’, 1919

image

 Robert Henderson Blyth – The Artist’s Wife Hanging out the Laundry, 1947

The Studio Magazine – March 1958

Bardfield Cookery Collection – Vol IV – Chloe Cheese

Here to go on with the Great Bardfield Cookery Collection are some of Chloe Cheese’s illustrations for Big Flavours and Rough Edges by David Eyre and the Eagle Cook, published in 2001.

Chloe Cheese is an English illustrator, painter and print-maker. She was born in London, the daughter of artist and printmaker Bernard Cheese and artist and illustrator Sheila Robinson. Her childhood was spent in Great Bardfield, Essex. She studied at Cambridge School of Art and the Royal College of Art.

image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Hoyle at Great Lodge Farm

There are three villages in a remote area of north Essex which, for different reasons, attract attention: Thaxted for its magnificent church, Finchingfield as a near perfect example of a picturesque English village, and Great Bardfield, which in the immediate post-war period attracted artists as a place to live and work. The coming together in one area, of several artists happened by chance, rather than design.

Hoyle moved first to Great Bardfield in 1952, living for a time in a farm cottage on the outskirts of Bardfield near Great Lodge Farm.

The farm was once part of a royal estate belonging to Anne of Cleves with large barns to hold hay to feed deer and other animals. In the 1950s some of the barns were pulled down but there is a brief visual record of the time the farm was working, rather than the wedding venue it has become today.

image

 Walter Hoyle – Great Lodge Farm, 1955 (Fry Art Gallery)

image

 Denise Hoyle – Great Lodge Farm, 1955 (Fry Art Gallery)

The view out of the front window of Walter and Denise’s home overlooked barns and the main farm house. Some of the sheds to the left of the house have gone now. Above Denise must have drawn the picture standing with her back to the barn, whereas Walter’s painting has a wider viewpoint and was done inside the house, with the oil lamp, staffordshire dog and the milkman. The workmen and people of the village made it in to many of the paintings Hoyle made. A lot of the machinery is painted in red too.

image

 Walter Hoyle – Great Lodge Farm Cottage, 1952 (Fry Art Gallery)

image

Above is a photograph by James Ravilious (son of Eric) and was taken in Devon, but I include it because the painting below has the same item in it. The painting by Hoyle depicts a grain elevator, designed to get grain or hay into the higher windows of a barn. Again it is painted in bright red, maybe because it was iron and was rusting, or it might have been a motif of his at the time.

The figure with the shotgun and dog may actually be a distant relative of mine on my mother’s side who worked on the farm in this period. Most of the men usually had a gun about them to shoot down deer, pheasants or most commonly, rabbits.

image

 Walter Hoyle – Great Lodge Farm, 1952 (In My Collection)

image

 Walter Hoyle – Great Lodge Farm, 1953 (Fry Art Gallery)

image

 Walter Hoyle – Winter – Great Lodge Farm, 1953c

From what I can understand of the area, this painting above is also taken out of the Hoyles house window in the winter time.

image

 Walter Hoyle – Great Lodge, 1952 (Fry Art Gallery)

† Printmaking Today – V6#2 – Great Bardfield Artists, 1997

Chocolate Idea

This is from my student days when I studied Graphic Design. It is a little off topic but I thought it was rather good fun. It was from a module when we had to design tourist merchandise. My idea was for Wedgwood chocolate bars made from milk chocolate with white chocolate cameos on top using some of Wedgwood’s designs. 

image
image
image
image

AIA Gallery

This is a small post, based on a little business card for the A.I.A. Gallery just because I liked it. It is designed by Edward Bawden. I have posted some text from the book on the A.I.A Gallery below. It sums up the organisation far better than I could.  

image

The A.I.A was also known as the Artists’ International Association

An exhibiting society formed in 1932 by a number of left-wings artists and writers who wanted to publicise, through their art, their commitment and resistance to the ‘Imperialist war on the Soviet Union, Fascism and colonial oppression’. Its aim was the ‘Unity of Artists for Peace, Democracy and Cultural Development’. The Association originally termed ‘Artists International’ provided a forum for regular discussions on communism, and its membership included Clifford Rowe, brothers Ronald and Percy Horton, Peggy Angus, Pearl Binder, James Boswell, Edward Ardizzone, Hans Feibusch and Misha Black the first Chairman. Most of the group’s early exhibitions were held at galleries in the Soho area of London, such as Charlotte Street, Frith Street and Soho Square. Its inaugural exhibition was entitled ‘The Social Scene’. In 1935 ‘Association’ was added to its title. A subsequent exhibition in that year called ‘Artists Against Fascism and War’ included works by Robert Medley, Paul Nash and Henry Moore.

The AIA supported the left-wing Republican side in the Spanish Civil War (1936-39) through exhibitions and other fund-raising activities. It attempted to promote wider access to art through travelling exhibitions and publicly available mural paintings. In 1940 it published a series of lithographs known as Everyman Prints in large and consequently low-priced editions. By the end of World War II, membership numbered over a thousand and in 1947 a gallery, founded by Claude Rogers was established at 15 Lisle Street, Soho, London which flourished until the lease expired in 1971. Initially it pursued an obvious Marxist programme, with its affiliates producing satirical illustrations for the magazine Left Review but by 1951 the Association was showing non-figurative work and in 1953 a new constitution abandoned its left-wing commitment and it continued solely as an exhibiting society. Distinguished foreign artists occasionally exhibited work at the later exhibitions: these included Fernand Léger and Picasso.

The Artists’ International Association should not be confused with the International Artists’ Association which was established in 1952 and was an affiliated organization of Unesco.

It tried to promote wider access to art through travelling exhibitions and public mural paintings. In 1940 it published a series of art lithographs titled Everyman Prints in large, and therefore cheap, editions.

A.I.A.: Story of the Artists’ International Association, 1933-53 by Lynda Morris and Robert Radford, 1983

Barnett Freedman for Guinness

Barnett Freedman worked in various ways for Guinness, not just advertising but also with the Guinness Lithograph print series. But here are three visual rhyme adverts I thought you would enjoy. 

image

 Barnett Freedman – Stick to Guinness & be well.

image

 Barnett Freedman – For strength and energy stick to Guinness

image

 Barnett Freedman – Oxford and Cambridge train crews on Guinness