
Recently I have been working on a duel biography of Nan Youngman and her role in Pictures for Schools. It is the story of her life through the people she knew and how it ended with each person gifting areas of knowledge and confidence for her to form the Pictures for Schools exhibitions – an annual event where councils from across England (and later Wales) could buy art to hang in schools to inspire children. This idea was quite radical for the post war era – to put real paintings in front of children and to banish reproduction prints of famous artworks.

Youngman was working for Cambridgeshire Council at the time as the Art Adviser under Henry Morris in the department for education in the council. Cambridgeshire invested in a Lowry in 1945 to get the experiment started and over the next few years with the help of the Society for Education through Art the exhibitions were formed in 1947 running until 1969.

After 1969, the momentum for many of the council’s collections started to slow down and by the millennium many of the collections of works into storage.
Cambridgeshire, the founder of the scheme was the first to sell of their collection of works due to a strange situation of the city – it was one of the few towns in the country not to have their own art gallery. Many of the museums in the city were owned by the University, including Fitzwilliam Museum. So with a collection of valuable mid-century art and nowhere to display them, they were sold off at auction. Soon Hertfordshire did the same after a large public consultation and then Nottingham sold off part of their collection via the Fry Art Gallery in Saffron Walden. Derbyshire took some effort to re-home their more famous works to institutions around the country but the rest of the works were auctioned off under the stealth guise of them being the collection of Barbara Winstanley, the art advisor who helped found the collection.

All this is very much in my mind but it comes at a drastic contrast to schools and education today. There is a new scheme to put art into schools, and as good as this sounds it also has a depressing reality. These artworks are not to be real paintings, or even prints, but photographs of famous works of art displayed on a TV screen that is located in key points of a school.

This scheme is run by the charity Art In Schools and is a resource to help children see art. They offer works by Picasso to George Stubbs, and even Andy Warhol. The key failing of this nice idea is that real Warhol prints are larger than you would expect – they are quite powerful works in dimension and also the texture of how they are printed. In the same way as they don’t really translate well in a book, a TV screen can never do them justice. In order to promote the idea the charity asked Damien Hirst, Bridget Riley, Cornelia Parker and Antony Gormley to suggest their favourite works of art to be on show.
The brochure for the Charity highlights they are: Closing the Art Gap that has happened in the underfunding of schools, how they are helping disadvantaged areas by bringing art into the classroom and they encourage children to think about art as a career and help with the national syllabus. They also add that seeing art supports mental health in children and promotes equality and diversity. These are more or less the original ideas of Youngman’s scheme in 1945. But in short there is no way the texture; scale or tonality of a painting can be judged from a digital screen.
Underfunding in the arts is a problem and cutting these services are seen as an easy way for cash strapped councils to save money as the true impact of the ideas are harder to grade. The problem has got so bad that Sotheby’s Auction house has been approaching councils in England to Value their most valuable objects as a free service, in the hopes they will auction them off. This is a gateway drug into councillors looking at the short term gains of making money against the benefits to the culture of their towns.
When Simon Wallis, the director of the council backed Hepworth Wakefield gallery was asked about Sotheby’s scheme he said:
“If works are sold to attempt to mitigate financial shortfalls for local authorities, the public permanently loses a major valued resource, generations in the making, and the underlying structural problems of local government funding will remain fundamentally unchanged.”
It’s a hard scheme to judge because at the moment standards are so low that anything is better than nothing. But it feels like the ambitions of councils and the opinion of the wider public towards the arts have been set too low.

Councils approached by Sotheby’s include Derby City Council, which has a collection of paintings by 18th century artist Joseph Wright that were valued by the auction house for insurance purposes at £64m in 2012. In 2024 Suffolk council cut the arts budget to the county by £500,000 but after a public backlash they cancelled this plan and tried to promote the cut not happening that the council had gained £500,000 for the arts.
It is all a trend in the wrong direction while looking to be progressive.
- Nan Youngman & Pictures for Schools will be out in May 2025.